| 1 | The Four-Day Work Week: A 90-Day Pilot Proposal | Title slide | Title, subtitle: "A structured, reversible test with two volunteer teams," presenter name and title, date | Not presented -- on screen as audience enters |
| 2 | We lost 14% of our workforce last year. The industry average was 11%. | Headline only | Single statistic in large type -- company attrition figure vs. benchmark | "That 3-point gap is not random. Exit interviews from Q4 point to the same themes: workload, flexibility, and feeling like their time is not respected. That is the context for what I am about to propose." |
| 3 | What our people told us they need | Headline + data viz | Horizontal bar chart showing top 5 exit interview themes, sorted by frequency; "schedule flexibility" highlighted as #2 | "This is not a survey of what people say they want -- this is what people who actually left said was driving their decision. Schedule flexibility is the number two reason." |
| 4 | The talent market has permanently repriced | Headline + bullets | 3 bullets: (1) Remote-first companies now compete for the same local talent, (2) Flexible schedule is a top-3 offer criterion for candidates under 40, (3) Our last 3 senior offers were rejected -- 2 cited flexibility | "We are not competing with the company down the street anymore. We are competing with remote-first employers who can offer schedule autonomy we currently cannot match." |
| 5 | Retention is an expensive problem | Headline + data viz | Stacked bar chart: fully-loaded cost to replace one employee by role level (junior, mid, senior); total annual replacement cost estimate bottom-right | "Replacing a single mid-level employee costs us roughly 1.2x their annual salary when you account for recruiting, onboarding, and the productivity gap while a seat is empty. We spent approximately $X on replacement costs last year." |
| 6 | What if the five-day week is causing the problem -- not solving it? | Headline only | Single provocative question in large type -- transition into conflict zone | "Here is a question I want to sit with before we get into the proposal. What if the five-day structure itself is one of the drivers of the cost I just showed you?" |
| 7 | The evidence from 61 companies that tried it | Headline + data viz | Scatter plot or bubble chart: 61 companies from the 2022 UK four-day week trial, x-axis = revenue change, y-axis = staff retention change, majority in positive quadrant | "This is the largest controlled trial ever conducted on the four-day work week -- 61 companies, 2900 employees, six months. The result was not a mixed picture. 92% of companies continued the policy after the trial ended." |
| 8 | What actually happened to productivity | Comparison | Two columns: "What executives feared" (revenue decline, customer complaints, project delays, team coordination failure) vs. "What the data showed" (0.7% average revenue increase, customer satisfaction unchanged, 22% reduction in sick days) | "I am showing you this because I know what you are thinking. Every concern in the left column is legitimate. The right column is not spin -- it is published outcome data from a peer-reviewed study." |
| 9 | Not every model works | Headline + bullets | 3 bullets: (1) Compressed schedules (4x10-hour days) underperform the 32-hour model, (2) Client-facing teams need specific scheduling protocols to maintain coverage, (3) Success correlates strongly with manager buy-in and clear output metrics | "The research is clear on one thing: the four-day week is not a uniform policy that you switch on. The implementations that succeeded all shared three design characteristics -- and those are the three things our pilot design is built around." |
| 10 | Our pilot design is built to answer the right questions | Headline only | Transition slide: single phrase setting up the solution section | "So let me show you exactly how we would run this, what we would measure, and how we would know within 90 days whether to expand or stop." |
| 11 | Pilot Structure: What We Are Testing | Process/flow | 4-step flow: (1) Select 2 volunteer teams with output-measurable work, (2) Define pre-pilot baseline metrics (output, satisfaction, client ratings), (3) Run 90-day pilot -- 32 hours per week, not compressed schedule, (4) Compare against baseline and matched control teams | "The design is important. We are not just letting two teams try working less. We are running a structured experiment with defined success criteria, control groups, and a hard decision point at 90 days." |
| 12 | How we selected pilot teams | Comparison | Three columns: "Team Alpha -- Product Engineering" and "Team Beta -- Content & Brand" vs. criteria checklist (output measurable, no hard real-time client dependency, manager buy-in confirmed, current attrition higher than average) | "These two teams were not picked at random. They meet all four criteria for a clean experiment. Both managers have already been briefed and have committed to the pilot." |
| 13 | What success looks like -- and what stops the pilot | Comparison | Two columns: "Expansion triggers" (output maintained or improved, no client complaints, team satisfaction up) vs. "Pause triggers" (output drops >10% for 2+ consecutive weeks, client escalation, team conflict attributable to scheduling) | "We are not running this on faith. If output drops more than 10% for two consecutive weeks, we pause immediately. The stop criteria are defined up front, not after the fact." |
| 14 | The financial case | Headline + data viz | Simple waterfall chart: pilot cost (near zero -- no new hires, no software, manager time modest) vs. projected savings (even one retained employee per quarter exceeds cost) | "What does this pilot actually cost? Manager attention. That is it. If the pilot retains even one employee in 90 days who would otherwise have left, it pays for itself 10 times over based on the replacement cost figures I showed earlier." |
| 15 | What we are NOT proposing | Headline + bullets | 3 bullets: (1) Not a company-wide policy change, (2) Not a change to compensation or benefits, (3) Not a precedent -- pilot outcomes determine next steps | "I want to name the concerns directly. This is not a permanent policy announcement. It is not a change to compensation. It is a 90-day experiment with an off-ramp built in." |
| 16 | The ask | Headline + bullets | 3 bullets: (1) Approve 90-day pilot for Team Alpha and Team Beta starting [date], (2) Designate pilot oversight lead (I recommend COO), (3) Set 90-day decision review meeting now | "I am asking for one thing: approval to run the experiment. Not to implement the policy. To run the experiment so that in 90 days we are deciding based on our own data, not on someone else's." |
| 17 | If we do not test this, we are still making a choice | Headline only | Single statement -- restates the stakes of inaction | "The alternative to running the pilot is not 'wait and see.' It is continuing to lose people at 14% per year while our competitors offer something we have not tested." |
| 18 | Three things to remember | Headline + bullets | 3 bullets: (1) Our attrition cost last year was $X -- retention improvement is worth testing, (2) 92% of the 61-company trial chose to make the policy permanent, (3) This pilot costs essentially nothing to run | "Before we go to questions, I want to leave three numbers on the table." |
| 19 | 90 days from now, we will know. Let us find out. | Headline only | Final statement -- stays on screen during Q&A; restates confidence and forward motion | "I am ready for your questions. And I am ready to start planning the pilot as soon as we have alignment today." |