Search murage.ai Search the docs, videos, blog, apps, teams, skills and release notes.
At a glance
What it is
Design aligned curricula with clear learning objectives, assessment strategies, materials development, and scope-and-sequence planning for any subject or grade level.
A skill is a written procedure a bot loads when a job calls for it. This one is a single file, SKILL.md, and the whole file is on this page.
Length 319 lines1,779 words, about 9 min read
Category Education and learningprofessional development
Level Advanced
Teams that use this skill. Give your first job to Murage. Download the app, connect the AI you already pay for, and tell your Chief of Staff what needs doing. Plan on about ten minutes from install to a working team.
No account needed · Runs on the AI plan you already pay for
Open source license
Skill Guard education-industry teaching budgeting checklist template guide analysis research Paste it into your agent's instructions (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or a custom GPT), or add it to a bot in Murage.
Each of these library teams gives its bots this skill. Import one and look inside first.
Advanced
User needs guidance on curriculum designer concepts
User wants to implement or improve their approach to curriculum designer
The request falls outside the scope of curriculum designer
User needs a different specialized skill for their specific situation
The topic requires professional consultation beyond general guidance
Questions to Ask First Before designing or revising a curriculum, clarify:
What subject area and grade level or audience is this for?
What standards or competency frameworks must be addressed (state standards, professional certifications, institutional requirements)?
What is the total duration (semester, year, workshop series, module)?
What prior knowledge can you assume learners already have?
Are there required textbooks, platforms, or institutional constraints?
What assessment types does the institution prefer or require?
What is the class size and instructional format (lecture, seminar, lab, online)?
Backward Design Framework
Stage 1: Identify Desired Results Start every curriculum project by defining what learners should know and be able to do at the end.
Writing Effective Learning Objectives
Use the ABCD model for precision:
Component Description Example A udienceWho is learning "Third-grade students" B ehaviorObservable action (use measurable verbs) "will classify geometric shapes" C onditionContext or constraints "given a set of 20 mixed shapes" D egreeCriteria for success "with at least 85% accuracy"
Bloom's Taxonomy Verb Reference
Level Verbs for Objectives Remember define, list, recall, identify, name, state Understand explain, summarize, paraphrase, compare, describe Apply demonstrate, solve, use, implement, execute Analyze differentiate, organize, deconstruct, examine, contrast Evaluate judge, critique, justify, assess, defend Create design, construct, produce, formulate, compose
Objective Quality Checklist
☐ To do: Uses a single, observable, measurable verb
☐ To do: Specifies the audience clearly
☐ To do: Includes conditions under which performance occurs
☐ To do: States the minimum acceptable performance level
☐ To do: Aligns to at least one standard or competency
☐ To do: Is achievable within the allotted instructional time
Stage 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence For each objective, define how you will know learners achieved it.
Assessment Alignment Matrix Template
Learning Objective Assessment Type Format Weight Timing Objective 1 Formative Exit ticket quiz 5% Week 2 Objective 2 Summative Research paper 20% Week 6 Objective 3 Performance Lab demonstration 15% Week 8 Objective 4 Formative Peer review activity 5% Week 4
Assessment Type Selection Guide
Diagnostic : Use before a unit to gauge prior knowledge (surveys, pre-tests, concept maps)
Formative : Use during instruction to monitor progress (quizzes, journals, think-pair-share, polls)
Summative : Use at the end of a unit to evaluate mastery (exams, projects, portfolios, presentations)
Performance-based : Use when you need to assess application in realistic contexts (simulations, labs, case analyses)
Stage 3: Plan Learning Experiences Design activities that bridge from where learners are to where they need to be.
Instructional Sequence Pattern
Hook - Engage learners with a question, scenario, or provocation
Activate - Surface prior knowledge and connect to new content
Direct Instruction - Deliver core content (keep segments under 15 minutes)
Guided Practice - Structured activities with instructor support
Independent Practice - Learners apply concepts on their own
Check for Understanding - Quick formative assessment
Reflect and Connect - Learners synthesize and prepare for next lesson
Scope and Sequence Planning
Unit Planning Template Unit Title: [Name]
Duration: [Number of weeks/sessions]
Essential Question: [Open-ended question that drives inquiry]
Standards Addressed: [List codes and descriptions]
Week-by-Week Breakdown:
Week 1:
Topics: [List]
Objectives: [Reference objective codes]
Activities: [List key activities]
Assessment: [Any formative checks]
Materials: [Readings, resources, tools]
Week 2:
[Same structure]
Unit Summative Assessment:
Type: [Project / Exam / Presentation / Portfolio]
Description: [Brief description]
Rubric: [Reference or attach]
Pacing Guide Considerations Front-load foundational concepts that later units depend on
Build in buffer days (roughly 10% of total sessions) for reteaching or enrichment
Place major assessments at natural transition points
Ensure spiraling: revisit key concepts across multiple units with increasing complexity
Account for institutional calendar events (breaks, testing windows, assemblies)
Materials Development
Lesson Plan Template Lesson Title:
Date/Session:
Duration:
Objective(s):
Materials Needed:
- [List all resources, handouts, technology, supplies]
Standards Alignment:
- [Standard code]: [Description]
Procedure:
Opening (5-10 min):
- [Hook or warm-up activity]
Instruction (15-20 min):
- [Core content delivery method]
- [Key vocabulary or concepts]
Guided Practice (10-15 min):
- [Structured activity with support]
Independent Practice (10-15 min):
- [Student-driven application]
Closing (5 min):
- [Exit ticket, reflection, or preview of next lesson]
Differentiation:
- Approaching: [Scaffolds for struggling learners]
- On-Level: [Standard expectations]
- Advanced: [Extension opportunities]
Assessment Evidence:
- [What you will collect or observe]
Reflection (post-lesson):
- What worked:
- What to adjust:
- Notes for next time:
Resource Selection Criteria When choosing textbooks, readings, or digital resources, evaluate:
Criterion Questions to Ask Alignment Does it directly support stated objectives? Accuracy Is the content current and factually correct? Accessibility Is it readable at the appropriate level? Available in multiple formats? Engagement Does it include varied examples, visuals, and interactive elements? Inclusivity Does it represent diverse perspectives and avoid bias? Cost Is it within budget? Are there open-source alternatives? Licensing Can it be reproduced or shared as needed?
Rubric Design
Analytic Rubric Template Criterion Exemplary (4) Proficient (3) Developing (2) Beginning (1) Criterion A [Description of exemplary performance] [Description of proficient performance] [Description of developing performance] [Description of beginning performance] Criterion B [Same pattern] Criterion C [Same pattern]
Rubric Writing Guidelines Each cell should describe what IS present, not what is missing
Use parallel language across levels
Include specific, observable indicators
Limit to 4-6 criteria per rubric to keep grading manageable
Share rubrics with learners before the assignment begins
Curriculum Review Checklist Use this when auditing an existing curriculum or reviewing a draft:
☐ To do: Every objective maps to at least one assessment
☐ To do: Every assessment maps back to at least one objective
☐ To do: Content progresses logically from foundational to advanced
☐ To do: Prerequisite knowledge is explicitly identified
☐ To do: Differentiation strategies are included for each unit
☐ To do: Materials are current, accessible, and appropriately licensed
☐ To do: Time allocations are realistic with buffer built in
☐ To do: Student voice and choice are incorporated where possible
☐ To do: The curriculum reflects diverse perspectives
☐ To do: Formative assessments appear frequently enough to catch gaps early
☐ To do: Summative assessments use varied formats across the term
☐ To do: Technology requirements are identified and feasible
Common Pitfalls Objective bloat : Trying to cover too many objectives in one unit. Focus on depth over breadth.
Assessment mismatch : Testing recall when the objective calls for application. Always check alignment.
Pacing optimism : Underestimating the time needed for complex topics. Add buffer days.
Resource dependency : Building a curriculum around a single textbook rather than around objectives.
Neglecting prerequisite mapping : Assuming knowledge learners may not have. Validate with diagnostics.
Static design : Treating the curriculum as finished. Plan for annual review and revision cycles.
Collaboration Tips When working with a team of educators on curriculum design:
Establish shared vocabulary and design principles before writing
Assign unit ownership but review collectively
Use a shared template so units are consistent
Build in vertical alignment meetings across grade levels or course sequences
Document decisions and rationale so future revisions have context
Pilot new units with a small group before full rollout
Process Gather information. Ask the user clarifying questions to understand their specific situation, goals, and constraints
Analyze context. Review the information provided and identify key factors relevant to curriculum designer
Develop recommendations. Apply domain expertise to create actionable guidance tailored to the user's needs
Present structured output. Deliver findings in the output format below with clear next steps
Address follow-ups. Answer additional questions and refine recommendations based on feedback
template ## Curriculum Designer Analysis
### Assessment
[Key findings and observations]
### Recommendations
1. [Primary recommendation]
2. [Secondary recommendation]
3. [Additional suggestions]
### Action Items
- [ ] [First action step]
- [ ] [Second action step]
- [ ] [Follow-up task]
Edge Cases Incomplete information: Ask clarifying questions before proceeding with recommendations
Conflicting requirements: Prioritize the most critical constraint and note trade-offs
Out of scope requests: Redirect to appropriate specialized skill or professional resource
Beginner vs advanced: Adjust depth and terminology based on user's experience level
Example Input: "Help me with curriculum designer for my current situation"
Based on your situation, here is a structured approach to curriculum designer:
Assessment: Evaluate your current state and identify key areas for improvement
Strategy: Develop a targeted plan based on best practices
Implementation: Execute the plan with specific, measurable steps
Review: Monitor progress and adjust as needed
SKILL.md
319 lines · 1,779 words
The text of SKILL.md is shown as it downloads, under the Apache-2.0 license, by Ferrox Labs. The license is the one in the file's own frontmatter.
Your new bot
Curriculum Designer bot
Waiting in your sidebar once you say go.
No account needed · Runs on the AI plan you already pay for